Re: said, reply ? /retake 12/10/95 posted by rg

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ RAINER'S READING SEMINAR ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by stephan pascher on August 04, 1996 at 12:46:11:

In Reply to: Re: said, reply 4 /retake 12/07/95 posted by rg posted by carol broad on August 04, 1996 at 12:40:19:

: Msg#: 3762 *TALK SHOW*
: 12-07-95 19:16:19Msg#: 5321 *TALK SHOW*
12-10-95 18:40:48
From: Stephan Pascher
To: Carol Broad
Subj: Reply to Msg# 3762 (RS)
Thanks for your response. Yes, you are probably right; so very boring and
predictable. And it is very interesting what you say about Heidegger and
Braque. All that cutting and pasting, art/praxis debate; very moving. Have
they actually resolved the Braque/Picasso dispute? Since you are you are so
well versed in Heidegger's thought, perhaps you should pick up some Lukas. It
has loads of goodies on "PC Consciousness." Overall, it makes a pretty good
read. Perhaps you are already acquainted with it?

: From: Carol Broad
: To: Stephan Pascher
: Subj: Reply to Msg# 2087 (RS)
: Bah, this Heidegger bashing is so boring and predictable. I wonder if anyone
: here ever bothered to pick up Being and Time, let alone read a paragraph or
: two. Leave me alone with your cloned "critical" pc consciousness. If
: Heidegger is good enough for Braque, he's good enough for me.
: Check out Time Warner's Palace chat - you guys would make great icons!

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ RAINER'S READING SEMINAR ] [ FAQ ]