Click
HERE to check out the cover of the latest issue.
RD: I want to find out what FAT is all about.
I've seen two issues in as many years--how often does
it come out?
JM: Well, it's not coming out very regularly, but we're
trying to produce two issues a year.
RD: What are you trying to do with the magazine?
JH: It's an art magazine, but it's one which caters to
neither of its constituencies; neither the one suggested
by the word 'art' nor the one suggested by the word
'magazine'. To sum it up in, say, three words I would say
it's a "war against bullshit." It's designed to throw
open the doors to a larger community; art fends for itself
in a stream of popular culture.
JM: It's much less an academic magazine than a sort of
blue-collar art magazine, so it will make sense to people
who don't know much about art. It's also entertaining for
people who can't figure out what it's about.
RD: I belong to the latter category, although it seems
that one of the most important things is the layout of the
magazine, which is full of random photographs that have
been touched-up and are juxtaposed with the text. I guess
all of these old pictures had to be bought from an archive?
JM: Actually they're all art pieces, even the advertising
is mostly art.
JH: But the photo of the Serbian terrorist Arkan on his
wedding-day is a journalistic image that had to be bought.
The magazine repays examination; it has the look of a
mock-tabloid at first and may seem frivolous, but if you examine it
it has a certain unity which holds everything together. You
can take the time to read it, there's plenty to read.
JM: It's not merely sensational--it's much more serious than
it first appears.
RD: That's what I was wondering when I first looked at it:
how serious is this? What are all these articles about,
anyway?
JM: FAT is probably the most subjective magazine on any stand.
It's very much about our personal choice and most of the
people who contribute to the magazine are people we know.
JH: But we have accepted submissions from other people.
Some people have just walked into the office off the street.
Richard Ryan, who wrote the piece in this issue entitled "Hard-asses of the Confederacy",
for example.
JM: Of course there's a theme to each issue. The first was
"Good & Evil" and this one is "Surrender"--we look for
contributions that have to do with the over-riding idea.
RD: What is there to say about issue no.2?
JH: Well you'll find a tag from Henry Miller under the
editorial: "like a soldier who gets what he's been waiting
for, I was dispatched to the rear." Of course the title
of the magazine is FAT, which is already antithetical
to the strivings of millions of Americans who are trying
to shave off pounds of their weight. "Surrender" is another
very antithetical idea, it's not one of our national traits.
The kind of writing we want is writing which is not self-conscious,
which is a little bit self-abandoned--we're aiming for a sense of
liberation from dramatic conventions and from sterile oppositions
like liberal/conservative and all of that tweedle-dee-tweedle-dum
market controversy which is 80% of your diet in the press.
I guess we're flying a flag of pulp, at least visually,
but it's "pulp against pap", which is our make-shift slogan.
The best way to see what FAT is about is to take
a copy and to show it to a pedant, and mark his reaction.
RD: Do you have to look very hard to find the nagazine?
JM: It's actually distributed world-wide, but in New York
you can get at at Tower Books, Barnes & Noble, Papyrus, and
at almost every newstand.
Josephine volunteered to read an excerpt from her editorial in issue no. 1:
"Personally, I prefer Italian porn to art-publications, and I was aroused by the
idea that young writers and artists would go down on me in
return for publishing their errata. Ardent young men sucking their
way into print. Like May West, I like to be visited between the holidays.
Having spent a string of art-grants on cocaine and car body-work,
I had nothing to lose."
This was so much fun that she kept on, this time reading from her editorial in issue no.2:
"I never said that cunnilingus guaranteed publication in
FAT; it's merely a precondition and much easier than
establishing academic credentials, mastering one's language,
visiting foreign battlefields or many of the other conventional
routes. Nonetheless some wrinkled carp is litigating because
he did the dive but I didn't print his jive. When I belonged
to the East-German Stasi I secretly adored American pop-culture,
but since moving to the states I've revised my opinion: people
here are either screwing or suing eachother."
RD: How did FAT get started?
JM: Well, when I got to New York I didn't really find anything
that I felt compeleed to be a part of, so I decided to create my
own context to allow certain ideas of mine to happen. There are
a lot of artists and writers who are amazing and whose work I wanted
to see published.
JH: Although there are writers and artists appearing in the magazine,
it's virtually useless as a tool of self-promotion. When you see a
painting, it'll have a credit on the side like a photojournalist's
credit--it sinks or swims in the stream of images. It's not an ART
IN AMERICA type promotional blurb. FAT leaves out
the mediations of priests and charlatans; if a reader wants to discover
more about the artists whose material makes up the magazine, they're
invited to do that on their own terms.
Queries and submissions to FAT are welcome by mail or by fax at (212)226-7347.
The editors stress that they look at everything--"This is not a clique
that you have to penetrate."
Look for issue no.3 in the fall. Email: ThingReviews
To post a response fill out the following form and click the "Submit" button. Or go back...
Scroll down to read messages.